Controlar os militares? Uma análise da dimensão de accountability sobre a atuação doméstica das Forças Armadas no Brasil
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26792/rbed.v6n1.2019.75120Palavras-chave:
Relacionamento Civil Militar, Democracia, Segurança PúblicaResumo
O artigo analisa a accountability sobre as operações de garantia da lei e da ordem. A partir de entrevistas com tomadores de decisão e atores da sociedade civil, que foram codificadas e analisadas através do software Nvivo, a pesquisa conclui que o controle civil está concentrado antes do início das operações militares.
Downloads
Referências
Aguero, Felipe. 1992. “The Military and the Limits to Democratization in South America.” In Issues in Democratic Consolidation: The New South American Democracies in Comparative Perspective, organizado por Scott Mainwaring, Guillermo O’Donnell, and J. Samuel Valenzuela, 153–99. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
_____. 1995. Soldiers, Civilians and Democracy: Post-Franco Spain in Comparative Perspective. Baltimore: John Hopkins University.
Arturi, Carlos S. 2001. “O Debate Teórico Sobre Mudança de Regime Político: O Caso Brasileiro.” Revista de Sociologia e Política no. 17, 11–31. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-44782001000200003.
Bernazzoli, Richelle M., and Colin Flint. 2010. “Embodying the Garrison State? Everyday Geographies of Militarization in American Society.” Political Geography 29 no. 3, 157–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2010.02.014.
Born, Hans. 2006. “Democratic Control of Armed Forces. Relevance, Issues and Research Agenda.” In Handbook of the Sociology of the Military, organizado por Giuseppe Caforio, 151–66. New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-34576-0.
Bovens, Mark. 2007. “Analysing and Assessing Accountability: A Conceptual Framework.” Ssrn 13 no. 4, 447–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00378.x.
Bruneau, Thomas C. 2001. “Ministries of Defense and Democratic Civil-Military Relations.” Monterey, California: The Center for Civil-Military Relations. Naval Postgraduate School. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48056-5_1.
Bruneau, Thomas C., and Florina Cristiana Matei. 2008. “Towards a New Conceptualization of Democratization and Civil-Military Relations.” Democratization 15 no. 5, 909–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510340802362505.
Cohen, Samy. 2008. “Le Pouvoir Politique et l’Armée.” Pouvoirs 125, 19–28.
Dahl, Robert Alan. 1973. Poliarchy. Participation and Opposition. 4. ed. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
Diamint, Rut. 2015. “A New Militarism in Latin America.” Journal of Democracy 26 no. 4, 155–68. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2015.0066.
Diamond, Larry. 2010. “Liberation Technology.” Journal of Democracy 21 no. 3, 69–83. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.0.0190.
Diamond, Larry, Marc F. Plattner, Yun-han Chu, and Hung-mao Tien, eds. 1997. Consolidating the Third Wave Democracies. Themes and Perspectives. Baltimore, Maryland: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Feaver, Peter. 2003. Armed Servants. Agency, Oversight, and Civil-Military Relations. Cambridge, Massachusetts, and London, England: Harvard University Press.
Fitch, Samuel J. 1998. The Armed Forces and Democracy in Latin America. Baltimore, Maryland: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Fuccille, Luiz Alexandre. 2006. “Democracia e Questão Militar: A Criação do Ministério da Defesa no Brasil.” Instituto de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas, Tese de Doutorado, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (Unicamp).
Garreton, Manuel Antonio. 1989. “La Relación Entre Transición y Consolidación: Los Enclaves Autoritarios.” In La Posibilidad Democratica En Chile, 1. ed., 51–63. Chile: FLACSO.
Geisser, Vincent, Olivier Dabène, e Gilles Massardier. 2008. “La Démocratisation Contre La Démocratie.” In Autoritarismes Démocratiques. Démocraties Autoritaires Au XXI Siècle, organizado por Olivier Dabène et al., 7–26. Paris: Découverte Recherches.
Guedes da Graça, Luís Felipe. 2014. “Independência ou Irrelevância? Produção Legislativa e Vetos na Assembleia Legislativa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (1983-2010).” Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro.
Guittet, Emmanuel-Pierre. 2006. “Military Activities Within National Boundaries: The French Case.” In Illiberal Practices of Liberal Regimes: The (in) Security Games, edited by Didier Bigo and Anastassia Tsoukala, 136–62. Paris: L’Harmatan.
Hassenteufel, Patrick. 2014. Sociologie Politique: L’Action Publique. 2. ed. Paris: Armand Colin.
Helmke, Gretchen, and Steven Levitsky. 2006. “Introduction.” In Informal Institutions and Democracy. Lessons from Latin America, 1–32. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Hunter, Wendy. 1995. “Politicians against Soldiers: Contesting the Military Postauthorization Brazil.” Comparative Politics 27 no. 4, 425–43. https://doi.org/papers2://publication/uuid/C134FD4E-3318-4EAB-8AD7-7339C62CD089.
Huntington, Samuel P. 1991. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman, Okla: University of Oklahoma Press.
Janowitz, Morris. 1960. The Professional Soldier. A Social and Political Portrait. Glencoe, Illinois: The Free Press.
Joo, Ruodolf. 1996. “The Democratic Control Of Armed Forces.” Chaillot Paper 23 (February).
Kappeler, Victor E., and Peter B. Kraska. 2015. “Normalising Police Militarisation, Living in Denial.” Policing and Society 25 no. 3, 268–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2013.864655.
Kiewiet, D. Roderick, and D. McCubbins. 1991. The Logic of Delegation. Congressional Parties and the Appropriations Process. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Lemos, Leany Barreiro de Sousa. 2005. “Controle Legislativo em Democracias Presidencialistas: Brasil e EUA em Perspectiva Comparada.” Instituto de Ciências Sociais, Tese de Doutorado, Universidade de Brasília (UnB).
Lima, Carlos Alberto de. 2012. Os 583 Dias da Pacificação dos Complexos da Penha e do Alemão. Rio de Janeiro: Agência 2A Comunicação.
Limongi, Fernando, and Argelina Figueiredo. 2002. “Em Busca Do Orçamento Perdido III.” Insight Inteligencia 16, 145–56.
Mainwaring, Scott, Guillermo O’Donnell, and J. Samuel Valenzuela, eds. 1992. Issues in Democratic Consolidation: The New South American Democracies in Comparative Perspective. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
Mainwaring, Scott, and Christopher Christoper Welna. 2003. Democratic Accountability in Latin America. Oxford Studies in Democratization. https://doi.org/10.1093/0199256373.001.0001.
Mares, David R. 2003. “U.S. Drug Policy and Mexican Civil-Military Relations: A Challenge for the Mutually Desirable Democratization Process.” Crime, Law and Social Change 40 no. 1, 61–75.
O’Donnell, Guillermo. 1993. “On the State, Democratization and Some Conceptual Problems: A Latin American View with Glances at Some Postcommunist Countries.” World Development 21 no. 8, 1355–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(93)90048-E.
P. Huntington, Samuel. 1957. The Soldier and the State. The Theory and Politics of Civil-Military Relations. Cambridge Massachussets: The Belknap Press of Harvad University Press.
Passos, Anaís Medeiros. 2014. “O Estado Das Relações Civis-Militares No Brasil: Um Estudo de Caso Sobre o Ministério Da Defesa (2007-2011).” Departamento de Ciência Política, Dissertação de Mestrado, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul.
Passos, Anaís M Medeiros. 2018. “The Military Mystique: Democracies and the War on Crime in Brazil and Mexico.” Centre de Recherches Internationales, Tese de Doutorado, Sciences Po Paris.
Pion-Berlin, D., ed. 2001. Civil-Military Relations in Latin America. New Analytical Perspectives. Chapel Hill and London: The University of North Carolina Press.
Pion-berlin, David. 1992. “Military Autonomy and Emerging Democracies in South America.” Comparative Politics 25 no. 1, 83–102.
Sapolsky, Harvey M., Eugene Gholz, and Caitlin Talmadge. 2009. US Defense Politics: The Origins of Security Policy. New York Oxford: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203892473.
Schedler, Andreas. 1999. “Conceptualizing Accountability.” In The Self-Restraning State: Power and Accountability in New Democracies, organizado por Andreas Schedler, Larry Diamond e Marc F. Plattner, 13–28. London: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Schiff, Rebecca L. 2009. The Military and Domestic Politics: A Concordance Theory of Civil-Military Relations. New York: Routledge.
Schmitter, Phillippe, and Terry Lyn Karl. 1991. “What Democracy Is.. and Is Not.” Journal Of Democracy 2 no. 3, 75–88.
Stepan, Alfred. 1988. Rethinking Military Politics. Brazil and the Southern Cone. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Suárez-Enríquez, Ximena. 2017. Overlooking Justice: Human Rights Violations Committed by Mexican Soldiers Against Civilians are Met with Impunity. Washington DC: Wola Advocacy for Human Rights in the Americas.
Trinkunas, Harold. 2005. Crafting Civilian Control of the Military in Venezuela: A Comparative Perspective. Chapel Hill and London: The University of North Carolina Press.
Urquhart, Cathy. 2017. “Grounded Theory Method.” In Grounded Theory for Qualitative Research: A Practical Guide, 2–25. 55 City Road: Sage Publications.
Weffort, Francisco. 1988. “Por Que Democracia?” In Democratizando o Brasil, organizado por Alfred Stepan, 483–519. São Paulo: Paz e Terra.
Zaverucha, Jorge. 1994. Rumor de Sabres. Tutela Militar ou Controle Civil? São Paulo: Editora Ática.
Zaverucha, Jorge, and Flavio da Cunha Rezende. 2009. “How the Military Competes for Expenditure in Brasillian Democracy: Arguments for an Outlier.” International Political Science Review 3 no. 4, 407–29.https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512109342689
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:1) Autores mantêm os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Attribution que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
2) Autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
3) Autores têm permissão e são estimulados a publicar e distribuir seu trabalho online (ex.: em repositórios institucionais ou na sua página pessoal) a qualquer ponto antes ou durante o processo editorial, já que isso pode gerar alterações produtivas, bem como aumentar o impacto e a citação do trabalho publicado (Veja O Efeito do Acesso Livre).
