A (im)possibilidade do uso de Lethal Autonomous Weapon System frente ao direito internacional humanitário e a ética

Autores

  • Haide Maria Hupffer Universidade Feevale
  • Gabriel Cemin Petry Universidade Feevale

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26792/rbed.v6n2.2019.75153

Palavras-chave:

Inteligência Artificial, Direito Internacional Humanitário, Lethal Autonomous Weapon System, Ética

Resumo

Este artigo discute o uso de Lethal Autonomous Weapon System (armas autônomas capazes de detectar e atacar alvos sem intervenção humana, detendo capacidade de autogoverno) que põe em xeque conceitos éticos e do Direito Internacional Humanitário, pela sua autonomia para realizar a tomada de decisões, como de vida ou morte.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Haide Maria Hupffer, Universidade Feevale

Haide Maria Hupffer
Pós-Doutora em Direito pela Unisinos
Doutora em Direito pela Unisinos
Docente e Pesquisadora no Programa de Pós-Graduação em Qualidade Ambiental e Curso de Direito da Universidade Feevale

Líder do Grupo de Pesquisa Direito e Desenvolvimento do CNPq/Feevale

Gabriel Cemin Petry, Universidade Feevale

Bacharelando em Direito na Universidade Feevale

Participante do Programa de Iniciação Científica da Universidade Feevale

Referências

Arkin, Ronald C. 2017. “A robotocist’s perspective on lethal autonomous weapon systems”. Perspectives on Lethal Autonomous Weapon Systems, no. 30 (November): 35-47. https://www.unog.ch/80256EDD006B8954/(httpAssets)/6866E44ADB996042C12581D400630B9A/$file/op30.pdf

Asaro, Peter. 2012. On banning autonomous weapon systems: human rights, automation, and the dehumanization of lethal decision-making. International Review of the Red Cross, v. 94, no. 886 (Summer): p. 687-709. doi:10.1017/S1816383112000768

Brasil. 1993. Decreto n°.849, de 25 de junho de 1993. http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/decreto/1990-1994/D0849.htm.

Brasil. 2002. Decreto n°.4388, de 25 de setembro de 2002. http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/decreto/2002/D4388.htm

Boulanin, Vincent. 2016. Mapping the development of autonomy in weapon systems: A primer on autonomy. Solna, Sweden: SIPRI, (December).

https://www.sipri.org/sites/default/files/Mapping-development-autonomy-in-weapon-systems.pdf

Davison, Neil. 2017. A Legal Perspective: Autonomous weapon systems under international humanitarian law. Perspectives on Lethal Autonomous Weapon Systems, no. 30 (November): 5-18. https://www.unog.ch/80256EDD006B8954/(httpAssets)/6866E44ADB996042C12581D400630B9A/$file/op30.pdf

Faggella, Daniel. 2018. What is Artificial Intelligence? An Informed Definition, Emerj Artificial Intelligence Research.TechEmergence. (December). https://emerj.com/ai-glossary-terms/what-is-artificial-intelligence-an-informed-definition/

Frost, Mervyn. 2005. Ética y guerra: más alla de la teoria de la guerra justa. Revista Académica de Relaciones Internacionales, no. 3, (Octubre): 1-27. https://revistas.uam.es/index.php/relacionesinternacionales/article/view/4840/5309.

Hagstörm, Martin. 2016. “Characteristics of autonomous weapon systems”. Autonomous Weapon Systems: Implications of Increasing Autonomy in the Critical Functions of Weapons. Expert meeting, Geneva, Switzerland: ICRC (15-16 March): 23-25. https://shop.icrc.org/autonomous-weapon-systems.html?___store=fr&_ga=2.36932896.1627033310.1572366031-1120845335.1572366031

ICRC. 2016. Views of the ICRC on autonomous weapon systems. Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons Meeting of Experts on Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems (LAWS), Geneva, 11-16 April 2016. https://www.icrc.org/en/document/views-icrc-autonomous-weapon-system

Jonas, Hans. 2006. O princípio responsabilidade: Ensaio de uma nova ética para civilização tecnológica. Rio de Janeiro: Contraponto, Ed. PUC-Rio.

Legg, Shane, and Marcus Hutter. 2006. “A formal measure of machine intelligence”, In Proc. 15th Annual Machine Learning Conference of Belgium and The Netherlands, (May) 73-80. https://arxiv.org/abs/cs/0605024v1

Lele, Ajey. 2016. Missile-and rocket-defence weapon systems. Autonomous Weapon Systems: Implications of Increasing Autonomy in the Critical Functions of Weapons. Geneva, Switzerland: ICRC, (15-16 March): 31-32. https://shop.icrc.org/autonomous-weapon-systems.html?___store=fr&_ga=2.36932896.1627033310.1572366031-1120845335.1572366031

Lele, Ajey. 2017. “A military perspective on lethal autonomous weapon systems”. Perspectives on Lethal Autonomous Weapon Systems, no. 30 (November): 57-61. https://www.unog.ch/80256EDD006B8954/(httpAssets)/6866E44ADB996042C12581D400630B9A/$file/op30.pdf

ONU. 1994. Carta das Nações Unidas. Assinada em 26 de junho de 1945. https://nacoesunidas.org/carta/cap1/

Peterke, Sven. 2009. “Parte 1: Doutrinas Gerais”. Manual Prático de Direitos Humanos Internacionais. Brasília: Escola Superior do Ministério Público da União 96-181. https://www.ufrgs.br/cedop/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Manual_Pratico_Direitos_Humanos_Internacioais-1.pdf

Rezeck, Francisco. 2018. Direito internacional público: curso elementar. 17. ed, São Paulo: Saraiva.

Righetti, Ludovic. 2016. “Emerging technology and the future autonomous weapons”. Autonomous Weapon Systems: Implications of Increasing Autonomy in the Critical Functions of Weapons. Expert meeting, Geneva, Switzerland: ICRC (15-16 March): 36-39. https://shop.icrc.org/autonomous-weapon-systems.html?___store=fr&_ga=2.36932896.1627033310.1572366031-1120845335.1572366031

Rodriguez, Antonio Luis Terrones. 2018. “Inteligencia Artificial y ética de la Responsabilidad. Cuestiones de Filosofía, v. 4, no. 22, 141-170. https://doi.org/10.19053/01235095.v4.n22.2018.8311

Roff, Heather. 2016. “Sensor-fused munitions, missiles and loitering munitions”.

Autonomous Weapon Systems: Implications of Increasing Autonomy in the Critical Functions of Weapons. Expert meeting, Geneva, Switzerland: ICRC (15-16 March): 33-35. https://shop.icrc.org/autonomous-weapon-systems.html?___store=fr&_ga=2.36932896.1627033310.1572366031-1120845335.1572366031

Russel, Stuart J., and Peter Norvig. 2009. Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach . New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs. E-book.

Scherer, Matthew U. 2016. “Regulating Artificial Intelligence Systems: Risks, Challenges, Competencies, and Strategies”. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, vol. 29, no. 2 (Spring): 353-400. http://jolt.law.harvard.edu/articles/pdf/v29/29HarvJLTech353.pdf

Schwab, Klaus. 2018. Aplicando a Quarta Revolução Industrial. Traduzido por Daniel Moreira Miranda. São Paulo: EDIPRO.

Sehrawat, Vivek. 2016. “Autonomous weapon system: Law of armed conflict (LOAC) and other legal challenges”. Computer Law & Security Review: The International Journal of Technology Law and Practice, (Elsevier), Doi: 10.1016/j.clsr.2016.11.001

United Nations. 2015. Study on Armed Unmanned Aerial Vehicles - Prepared on the Recommendation of the Advisory Board on Disarmament Matters. New York: United Nations.

Vignard, Kerstin. 2016. “Addressing the challenges raised by increased autonomy”. Autonomous Weapon Systems: Implications of Increasing Autonomy in the Critical Functions of Weapons. Expert meeting, Geneva, Switzerland: ICRC (15-16 March): 65-68. https://shop.icrc.org/autonomous-weapon-systems.html?___store=fr&_ga=2.36932896.1627033310.1572366031-1120845335.1572366031 016

Zawieska, Karolina. 2017. “An ethical perspective on autonomous weapon system”. Perspectives on Lethal Autonomous Weapon Systems. no. 30 (November): 35-47. https://www.unog.ch/80256EDD006B8954/(httpAssets)/6866E44ADB996042C12581D400630B9A/$file/op30.pdf

Downloads

Publicado

2020-06-19

Como Citar

Hupffer, H. M., & Petry, G. C. (2020). A (im)possibilidade do uso de Lethal Autonomous Weapon System frente ao direito internacional humanitário e a ética. Revista Brasileira De Estudos De Defesa, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.26792/rbed.v6n2.2019.75153

Edição

Seção

Artigos