Iraq as a Lab: a Critique of the New American Way of War

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26792/rbed.v8n1.2021.75216

Palavras-chave:

Force Structure, Foreign Policy, US Army, Iraq Wars

Resumo

This paper analysis the evolution of the US force structure after 1975 in two core aspects: foreign policy and military modernization. Building on the works of Clausewitz (2003) and Mearsheimer (1981), we argue that a country's force structure should be based mainly on foreign policy considerations. The evolution of the US Army followed this logic until its defeat in Vietnam (1975), but this traumatic event precipitated reforms in the US military force before a proper reformulation of the country’s foreign policy objectives had been achieved. Therefore, these reforms created a "syndrome" that would deform and reform the US strategic culture inadequately. The new military doctrine, Air-Land Battle (ALB) was not oriented towards long-term political objectives, but rather by purely operational and tactical issues of combat, which proved harmful for the US interests in the long-run. Hence, we propose to analyze the Iraq Wars (1991-2003) as labs for this New American Way of War, the first empirical applications of ALB. We conclude by demonstrating that the disregard for post-war planning ended up forcing a prolonged and costly American involvement in the Middle East and damaging the country’s international image.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Marcela Fischer Friedman, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul Programa de Pós-Graduação em Estudos Estratégicos Internacionais

Mestra em Estudos Estratégicos Internacionais - UFRGS

Bachalera em Relações Internacionais - UFRGS

Silvia Regina Ferabolli, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul Programa de Pós-Graduação em Estudos Estratégicos Internacionais

PhD Politics and International Studies, SOAS

Professora Adjunta, Departamento de Economia e Relações Internacionais

Coordenadora do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Estudos Estratégicos Internacionais

Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, UFRGS

Referências

Biddle, Stephen, and Ivan Oelrich. “Future Warfare in the Western Pacific: Chinese Antiaccess/Area Denial, U.S. AirSea Battle, and Command of the Commons in East Asia.” International Security, 1, 41, no. 1 (July 2016): 7–48. https://doi.org/10.1162/isec_a_00249.

Biddle, Stephen. “Victory Misunderstood: What the Gulf War Tells Us about the Future of Conflict.” International Security, 1, 21, no. 2 (1996): 139–79. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2539073.

Biddle, Stephen. Military Power: Explaining Victory and Defeat in Modern Battle. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004.

Bilmes, Linda. “The Financial Legacy of Iraq and Afghanistan: How Wartime Spending Decisions Will Constrain Future National Security Budgets.” SSRN Electronic Journal, 2013, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2281275.

Boot, Max. “The New American Way of War.” Foreign Affairs 82, no. 4 (2003): 41–58. https://doi.org/10.2307/20033648.

Brzezinski, Zbigniev. EUA-URSS: o Grande Desafio. Rio de Janeiro, RJ: Nórdica, 1987.

Capoccia, Giovanni, and R. Daniel Kelemen. “The Study of Critical Junctures: Theory, Narrative, and Counterfactuals in Historical Institutionalism.” World Politics 59, no. 3 (April 2007): 341–69. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0043887100020852.

Capoccia, Giovanni. “Critical Junctures.” Oxford Handbooks Online, 1, May 2, 2016, 118–40. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199662814.013.5.

Chant, Christopher. Air War in the Gulf 1991. Oxford: Osprey, 2001.

Clausewitz, Carl von., and Maria Teresa. Ramos. Da Guerra. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2003.

Collier, Ruth Berins., and David Collier. Shaping the Political Arena: Critical Junctures the Labor Movement, and Regime Dynamics in Latin American. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1991.

Dale, Marie, Congressional Research Service, United States. Operation Iraqi Freedom: strategies, approaches, results, and issues for Congress § (2008).

Deflem, Mathieu, and Suzanne Sutphin. “Policing Post-War Iraq: Insurgency, Civilian Police, and the Reconstruction of Society.” Sociological Focus, 1, 39, no. 4 (November 2006): 265–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380237.2006.10571289.

Dicicco, Jonathan M, and Benjamin O Fordham. “The Things They Carried: Generational Effects of the Vietnam War on Elite Opinion.” International Studies Quarterly, 1, 62, no. 1 (January 17, 2018): 131–44. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqx068.

Dubik, James M. Ts. Building a Strategy-Based Force Structure. Arlington County, 1999. https://www.ausa.org/sites/default/files/LPE-99-10-Building-a-Strategy-based-Force-Structure.pdf.

Dunnigan, James F. How to Make War: a Comprehensive Guide to Modern Warfare in the Twenty-First Century. New York: Quill, 2003.

Dunstan, Simon, and Howard Gerrard. The Yom Kippur War 1973 (1): the Golan Heights. Oxford: Osprey Publishing Ltd., 2003.

Echevarria, Antulio J. War, Politics, and RMA: The Legacy of Clausewitz. Washington, DC: JFQ Forum, 1996.

Finlan, Alastair. The Gulf War 1991. New York: Routledge, 2003.

Fontenot, Gregory, E. J. Degen, and David Tohn. On Point: the United States Army in Operation Iraqi Freedom. Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press, 2005.

Gessert, Robert A. “The AirLand Battle and NATO's New Doctrinal Debate.” The RUSI Journal 129, no. 2 (June 1984): 52–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/03071848408522247.

J., Echevarria II Antulio. Toward An American Way Of War. Washington D.C.: Strategic Studies Institute, 2004.

Krepinevich, Andrew F. “Cavalry to Computer: The Pattern of Military Revolutions.” National Interest, September 1, 1994. Krepinevich.

Krepinevich, Andrew F. The Military-Technical Revolution: a Preliminary Assessment. Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, 2002.

Lock-Pullan, Richard. “How to Rethink War: Conceptual Innovation and AirLand Battle Doctrine1.” Journal of Strategic Studies 28, no. 4 (August 2005): 679–702. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390500301087.

Lock-Pullan, Richard. US Intervention Policy and Army Innovation: from Vietnam to Iraq. New York, NY: Routledge, 2006.

Mahnken, Thomas G. “The Future of Strategic Studies.” Journal of Strategic Studies 26, no. 1 (2003): x-xviii. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390308559305.

Mahnken, Thomas G. “What the Gulf War Can (and Cannot) Tell Us about the Future of Warfare.” International Security, 1, 22, no. 2 (1997): 151–62. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2539371.

Mahnken, Thomas G., Joseph A. Maiolo, and Michael Evans. “From Kadesh to Kandahar.” Essay. In Strategic Studies: a Reader, 375–90. London: Routledge, 2014.

Mahoney, James, and Dietrich Rueschemeyer. Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.

Mahoney, James. “Path Dependence in Historical Sociology.” Theory and Society, 1, 29, no. 4 (2000): 507–48. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1007113830879.

Malkasian, Carter. “International Forum in War History.” In AirLand Battle and Modern Warfare, 13th ed., 115–20. Tokyo: The National Institute For Defense Studies, 2014.

Mearsheimer, John J., and Brian Bond. “The British Generals Talk: A Review Essay.” International Security 6, no. 1 (1981): 165. https://doi.org/10.2307/2538535.

Mueller, John. “The Perfect Enemy: Assessing the Gulf War.” Security Studies, 1, 5, no. 1 (September 1995): 77–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/09636419508429253.

Neves, Edson José. “A Modernização Militar Da Índia: as Virtudes Do Modelo Híbrido.” Thesis, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Estudos Estratégicos Internacionais, Faculdade de Ciências Econômicas, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, 2015.

Perry, William J. “Desert Storm and Deterrence.” Foreign Affairs, 1, 70, no. 4 (1991): 66–82. https://doi.org/10.2307/20044914.

Perry, William J., Report of the Secretary of Defense to the President and the Congress § (1996).

Press, Daryl G. “Lessons from Ground Combat in the Gulf: The Impact of Training and Technology.” International Security, 1, 22, no. 2 (October 1997): 137–46. https://doi.org/10.1162/isec.22.2.137.

Press, Daryl G. “The Myth of Air Power in the Persian Gulf War and the Future of Warfare.” International Security 26, no. 2 (October 2001): 5–44. https://doi.org/10.1162/016228801753191123.

Rosen, Stephen Peter. “The Impact of the Office of Net Assessment on the American Military in the Matter of the Revolution in Military Affairs.” Journal of Strategic Studies, 1, 33, no. 4 (August 2010): 469–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2010.489704.

Salminen, Pertti. The Impact of Arms Technology on Military Doctrines: Documentation. Helsinki: War College, 1992.

Starry, Donn A. Mounted Combat in Vietnam. Washington, D.C.: Dept. of the Army, 1978.

Sterner, Eric R. “You Say You Want a Revolution (in Military Affairs)?” Comparative Strategy, 1, 18, no. 4 (October 1999): 297–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/01495939908403187.

Stiglitz, Joseph E. “The Anatomy Of A Murder: Who Killed America's Economy?” Critical Review, 1, 21, no. 2-3 (January 2009): 329–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/08913810902934133.

Taylor, William J., and James Blackwell. “The Ground War in the Gulf.” Survival: Global Politics and Strategy 33, no. 3 (May 1991): 230–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396339108442592.

Tilly, Charles, Gabriel Ardant, and Samuel Finer. “State and Nation-Building in Europe.” Essay. In The Formation of National States in Western Europe, 84–163. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1975.

Toffler, Alvin, and Heidi Toffler. War and Anti-War: Making Sense of Today's Global Chaos. London: Warner Books, 1995.

Tucker-Jones, Anthony. The Gulf War: Operation Desert Storm 1990-1991. Barnsley, South Yorkshire: Pen & Sword Military, 2014.

United States, Congressional Budget Office. The U.S. Military’s Force Structure: A Primer § (2016). https://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/114th-congress-2015-2016/reports/51535-fsprimer.pdf.

Weigley, Russell Frank. History of the United States Army. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1984.

Wolfowitz, Paul, Defense Planning Guidance FY 1994-99 § (1992).

Downloads

Publicado

2021-12-24

Como Citar

Fischer Friedman, M., & Ferabolli, S. R. (2021). Iraq as a Lab: a Critique of the New American Way of War. Revista Brasileira De Estudos De Defesa, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.26792/rbed.v8n1.2021.75216

Edição

v. 8 n. 1 (2021)

Seção

Artigos

Licença

Autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:

1) Autores mantêm os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Attribution que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.

2) Autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.

3) Autores têm permissão e são estimulados a publicar e distribuir seu trabalho online (ex.: em repositórios institucionais ou na sua página pessoal) a qualquer ponto antes ou durante o processo editorial, já que isso pode gerar alterações produtivas, bem como aumentar o impacto e a citação do trabalho publicado (Veja O Efeito do Acesso Livre).